Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 199 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |