Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 755 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 350 vs 344 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
350
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$412.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5999 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |