Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1205 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - 120 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
112
93%
Value, $/FPS
$2.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |