Buy on Amazon
$143.7
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $445
Availability
MSRP in USD: $445
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1794 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 266 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E3-1285L v4 or Core i5-10600K
Lost Ark, 1920 x 1080, Very High
151 FPS
$5.95/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i5-10600K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
