Buy on Amazon
$74.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1275 v2 is 162 days older than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD FX-6300 Black Edition 3.5 GHz Six Core 95W OEM with Thermal Paste Bundle
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E3-1275 v2 or FX-6300
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme
1 FPS
$1199.99/FPS
Radeon R7 240
FX-6300
8 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,199.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
