Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2756 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1270 - 171 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$405
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |