Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $339
Availability
MSRP in USD: $339
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v5 is 442 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930T - 185 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
