Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 463 days older than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 54 vs 51 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
