Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 2377 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1260L - 213 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |