Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1260L - 193 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |