Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 134 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$329
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |