Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2634 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 62% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 579 vs 358 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$740
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $740 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |