Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Pentium Gold G5400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 896 days older than Pentium Gold G5400T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Pentium Gold G5400T - 151 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
146
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |