Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1965 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 219 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$405
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |