Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 215 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$268.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1902 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |