Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v2 is 1077 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i7-950 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 69 vs 130 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
