Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v2 is 666 days newer than Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-760 - 113 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 69 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |