Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2927 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E3-1230 - 198 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
