Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1975 days newer than Xeon E3-1230 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 285 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |