Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1975 days newer than Xeon E3-1230 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 204 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$241.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $241.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |