Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1230 v5 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1230 v5 is 687 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1820 - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 53 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
116
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |