Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E3-1226 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1703 days newer than Xeon E3-1226 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |