Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1226 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1226 v3 is 1793 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 182 vs 177 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 15 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1226 v3
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
