Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v5 is 1091 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 187 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |