Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2046 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 543 vs 523 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
543
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |