Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 210 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |