Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 223 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 20 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4021 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |