Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2713 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 84 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 144 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$369
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3860 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |