Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1094 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 290 vs 287 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
290
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |