Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v5 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v5 is 1267 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 169 vs 163 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
