Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v5 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v5 is 847 days older than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 336 vs 316 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
316
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |