Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 337 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E-2276M - 393 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 16 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
393
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |