Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 657 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E-2276M - 189 vs 188 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |