Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 39 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 3400G - 129 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
122
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |