Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 757 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 22% better in Cities: Skylines II than Xeon E-2176M - 33 vs 27 FPS
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |