Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2136 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2136 is 1403 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 178 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 80 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2136
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
