Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1705 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 73 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G6950 - 116 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
109
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 135 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |