Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Pentium G620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1205 days newer than Pentium G620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Resident Evil 4 than Pentium G620 - 167 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Pentium G620
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
