Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 217 days older than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 44% better in Immortals of Aveum than Pentium G4620 - 46 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $103.0 vs $149.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Pentium G4620 - $2.24 vs $4.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13412 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |