Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670 is 1311 days older than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Pentium G4620 - 175 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $60.0 vs $149.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Deathloop than Pentium G4620 - $0.34 vs $0.88 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
97.71428571428571%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
38.63636363636364%
Price, $
$149.99
40%
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41189 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
64.59044368600682%
Multi-Core
1599
49.53531598513011%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |