Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $26.99 vs $242.17
- Up to 86% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600KF - $0.24 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G4400 - 137 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 20 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
113
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3565 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
13%
Price, $
$242.17
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3565 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |