Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-11400F - 554 vs 442 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $115.99 vs $242.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.26 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
554
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
59%
Price, $
$242.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
442
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |