Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250T outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250T is 897 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |