Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Pentium B950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1177 days newer than Pentium B950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium B950 - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B950 - 16 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium B950
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B950 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
