Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 859 days older than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than Pentium 3825U - 78 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 8 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
78
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |