Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2012 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 4 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 56% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core M-5Y51 - 131 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 20 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core M | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |