Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 2732 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 4 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core M-5Y51 - 192 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$308
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $308 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |