Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9940X - 138 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $225.0 vs $970.7
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9940X - $1.63 vs $7.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $970.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |