Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 242 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 105 vs 165 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
242
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |