Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 113 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $39.9 vs $300.15
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
41.118188251946215%
Multi-Core
992
10.506248676127939%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |